Criminal application filed under Criminal Appeal No. 81 of 2021 withdrawn by the applicant after court expressed disinclination to grant relief on merits. Proceeding disposed of as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the application granted; the application was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 434 OF 2021 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 81 OF 2021
(Kamalakar Laxman Dhasal Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another)
Mr. Sopan G. Bobde, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. S.N. Morampalle, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
Mr. V.U. Panpatil, Advocate for respondent No.2
CORAM :MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE :08.07.2021
PER COURT:
After hearing the learned Advocate for the applicant, learned
A.P.P. and learned Advocate for respondent No.2, when this Court
expressed its disinclination to grant any relief on merits, the learned
Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the
application. Leave is granted. The application is disposed of as
withdrawn.
[MANGESH S. PATIL]
JUDGE
npj/CRIAPLN434-2021
2 CRIAPLN434-2021
Kamalakar Laxman Dhasal
The State of Maharashtra
another
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court