Disposed
Vikas Gokuldas Bairagi v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bombay HCAPPLN/3016/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
909 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3016 OF 2021 IN BA/857/2020
VIKAS GOKULDAS BAIRAGI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Shri. U. S. Patil, Advocate for the applicant Shri. G. O. Wattamwar, APP for the respondent/State
CORAM : M. G. SEWLIKAR, J. DATED : 14th DECEMBER, 2021
PER COURT :-
Learned APP submits that respondent No. 2 has not sought extension of the period of temporary bail. In view of this, applicant is at liberty to take appropriate legal
action. In view of this application is disposed of.
[M. G. SEWLIKAR, J.]
ssp
1 of 1
ca3016.21.odt
VIKAS GOKULDAS BAIRAGI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
M. G. SEWLIKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court