In Criminal Application No.231 of 2018, the single-judge Bench held that the applicant was absent on two occasions including the hearing date. The application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rpa 1 / 1 10 appln 231 2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.231 OF 2018
Subhashchandra Kanojia .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Applicant absent.
Mr.S.R. Agarkar, APP for the Respondent – State. PSI S.A. Sonawane, Wadala T.T. Police Station, Mumbai, present.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATED : AUGUST 3, 2021.
P.C. :
On 19th July, 2021, applicant was absent. To give him an opportunity, the application was adjourned till today. Even today the applicant is absent. Hence, Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Digitally signed by RAJESHRI RAJESHRI PRAKASH PRAKASH AHER AHER Date: 2021.08.04 11:21:40 +0530
( PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
Subhashchandra Kanojia
State of Maharashtra
PRAKASH D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
