The High Court granted leave to the applicants to withdraw their criminal application for passport renewal after noting the trial had commenced for a related case, resulting in the application being dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the application; criminal application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crappln146.21.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 146 OF 2021
Vasant s/o Bansi Chavan & others
Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & another
Respondents
Mr. S. P. Rathod, advocate for the applicants. Mr. K. S. Patil, APP for Respondent-State. Mr. S. P. Salgar, advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : V.K.JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.
DATE : 26th October, 2021.
PC :
1 We have heard learned Counsel for the applicants for
some time.
2 Learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 has brought to our notice that the trial has already commenced and the case bearing SCC No.10276/2018 is now posted for evidence and arguments on 27th October, 2021, on the application fled by the present applicant for renewal of the passport.
3 In view of the above, learned Counsel for the
{2} crappln146.21.odt applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application.
4 Leave granted. Criminal Application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ) (V.K.JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE
adb
Vasant s/o Bansi Chavan & others
The State of Maharashtra
Another
V.K. Jadhav
Sandipkumar C. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
