Allowed

Unique Traders Pusad v. Mohd. Saleem S/O Mohd Yunus

Bombay HC12 Jan 2021APPA/449/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Application No. 449 of 2019, the High Court (Nagpur Bench) condoned 75 days of delay in filing an application to register a criminal appeal against an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and granted leave to appeal.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of 75 days delay, delay is condoned, appeal be registered, leave to file appeal granted.

Unique Traders Pusad Vs Mohd. Saleem S/O Mohd Yunus — Cheque Dishonour | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

7APPA 449.2019

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 449 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO............. OF 2019

¶4

(Unique Traders, Pusad, through its Proprietor of Mohd. Iqbal s/o Haji Noor Mohammad,
Yavatmal Vs. Mohd. Saleem s/o Mohd. Yunus Agawan, Amravati)

¶5

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directionsCourt's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.

¶6

Shri S. Raisuddin, Advocate for the applicant/
appellant.

¶7

CORAM : PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J.
 JANUARY 12, 2021.

¶8

Heard.

¶9

2]None appears for the respondent, though

¶10

served.

¶11

3]This is an application for condonation of
75 days delay caused in preferring criminal
application along with criminal appeal against the
order dated 03/12/2018 passed by the J.M.F.C.,
Pusad in Summary Criminal Case No. 1969/2012,
whereby the accused/respondent herein was
acquitted of the offence punishable under Section
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

¶12

4]Considering the reasons assigned in the
application, and finding them to be satisfactory, the

¶13

¶14

7APPA 449.2019

¶15

same is allowed. Delay is condoned. Appeal be
registered.

¶16

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO................ OF 2019 .

¶17

The appellant is seeking leave to file
appeal to challenge the order of acquittal..

¶18

2] Leave granted.

¶19

3]Issue notice for final disposal of the
matter to the respondent, returnable after four
weeks.

¶20

4] Call R & P.

¶21

JUDGE

¶22

Sumit

Unique Traders Pusad v. Mohd. Saleem S/O Mohd Yunus

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Unique Traders Pusad v. Mohd. Saleem S/O Mohd Yunus

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akshay Dhanraj Jayle Vs State of Mah, Thr P.So. Khallar, Tq. Daryapur, Amravati

Rajesh S/O Arun Dande Vs State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Balapur Tqbalapur Distakola

Pramod S/O Khushalrao Jadhav and Another Vs State of Mah. Thr. Officer in Charge, Ps, Wani Tah. Wani Distyavatmal

Shamrao Motiram Atram (in Jail) Vs State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Ps Laheri Distgadchiroli

Shamrao Motiram Atram (in Jail) Vs State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Ps Laheri Distgadchiroli

Ilyas S/O Lalu Gourve and Another Vs State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Ramdas Peth Tal. and Dist.Akola