The High Court of Bombay acquaints itself that the learned counsel for the applicant does not press the pending applications. The court grants liberty to move the appeal for final hearing in the future.
Liberty to move the appeal for final hearing after four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-1614-2017-APPA-C=.doc
Uday S. Jagtap
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1614 OF 2017
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 169 OF 2018
ALONG WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1621 OF 2019
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1614 OF 2017
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 486 OF 2021
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 169 OF 2018
Vrishal Madhukar Kalane .. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Vijaykumar Dhakane for the applicant
Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for respondent State
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV &
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.J.
DATED : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2021
P.C.
1. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that he would not press the applications for the time being.
2. Liberty to move the appeal for final hearing after four weeks.
Digitally signed by UDAY UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP SHIVAJI Date: JAGTAP 2021.09.2117:06:32 +0530
1 of 2
3-1614-2017-APPA-C=.doc
3. Stand over to 20th October, 2021.
4. All Applications stand disposed off.
(PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)2 of 2
Vrishal Madhukar Kalane
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
Prithviraj K. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court