Dismissed

Coliseum Co-Operative Premises Society Limited v. Jagshi Jethabhai Chheda and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC19 Mar 2021APP/367/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed an appeal against a Single Judge's order directing the applicants to remove office objections to a Notice of Motion and Suit. The Court requested the Single Judge to dispose of the pending Notice of Motion within 12 weeks excluding summer vacation before disposing of the main matters on merits.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed; Notice of Motion to be disposed of within 12 weeks excluding summer vacation by the Single Judge.

Coliseum Co-Operative Premises Society Limited… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

Digitally signed by Swaroop Swaroop S.Phadke S. Phadke Date: 2021.03.20 16:09:16 +0530

¶2

7.os.nma.675.19_app.367.19 (4).doc

¶3

S.S.Kilaje

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

O.O.C.J.

¶6

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 675 OF 2019 IN

¶7

APPEAL NO. 367 OF 2019 IN

¶8

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1454 OF 2019 IN

¶9

SUIT NO.832 OF 2019

¶10

Coliseum Co-operative Premises Society Limited

¶11

.. Applicants

¶12

In the Matter of :

¶13

Coliseum Co-operative Premises Society Limited

¶14

.. Appellants

¶15

Versus

¶16

Jagshi Jethabhai Chheda & Ors.

¶17

.. Respondents

¶18

Mr. Aspi Chinoy, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Sarosh Bharucha, Mr. Bhushan Shah, Ms. Palak Patel and Mr. Rishab Jain i/by Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co. for Applicants / Appellants

¶19

Mr. Pradeep Sancheti, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Rajiv Singh, Mr. V.S.Vengurlekar i/by Nair Vengurlekar & Co. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3

¶20

Ms. Dimple Vora i/by Markand Gandhi & Co. for Respondent No.2

¶21

CORAM : S. J. KATHAWALLA & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.

¶22

DATE : MARCH 19, 2021.

¶23

P.C.:

¶24

. By the above Appeal the Appellant has impugned the

¶25

Order dated 30.04.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge which is reproduced hereunder :

¶26

"1. Notice of Motion to be listed for hearing in due course. The arrangement continued till today, shall be continued further.

¶27

Registry to take on record the reply and the rejoinder.

¶28

1 of 2

¶29

7.os.nma.675.19_app.367.19 (4).doc

¶30

Defendants are permitted to file sur-rejoinder.

¶31

Within 4 weeks, applicant to remove all ofÏce objections in respect to the Notice of Motion as well as Suit, failing which, both, Notice of Motion and Suit will get dismissed for non removal of ofÏce objecting without further reference to the Court."

¶32

Though the impugned Order without specifying any particulars of the ‘arrangement’ directs the ‘arrangement’ to be ‘continued further’, in para - 3 of the afÏdavit in support of the Notice of Motion, the Appellant Society itself has explained the ‘arrangement’ as under :

¶33

"3. I say that the Impugned Order records an arrangement between the members of the Society and the Respondent No.1 and 3, whereby the Suit Property being the Adjacent land to the land on the which the Appellant Society stands as on today, is being used as parking spaces of the members of the Appellant Society for a monetary consideration."

¶34

3. Since the ‘arrangement’ as explained by the Appellant has continued from the date of the ad-interim Order, till date i.e. during the last two years, we do not intend to pass any other order in the above Appeal, save and except requesting the learned Single Judge to dispose of the Notice of Motion within a period of 12 weeks, excluding the summer vacation.

¶35

The Appeal as well as the Notice of Motion are accordingly disposed off.

¶36

( MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ) ( S. J. KATHAWALLA, J. )

¶37

2 of 2

Coliseum Co-Operative Premises Society Limited v. Jagshi Jethabhai Chheda and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Coliseum Co-Operative Premises Society Limited v. Jagshi Jethabhai Chheda and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Neelsidhi Developers Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sakharam Mahadev Jadhav, Since Deceased His Legal Hairs, Shri. Kailash S. Jadhav Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mr. Narayan Shankar Wambhire Vs His Excellency Mr. K. Shankar Narayan, Governor of Maharashtra and Ors.

Amber Spaces Private Limited Vs the State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Coliseum Co-Operative Premises Society Limited Vs Jagshi Jethabhai Chheda and 2 Ors.

Shri. Girijan Vallbhan Chelakatukara Velutnayar Vs Sub-Divisional Officer , Ichalkaranji Division, Ichalkaranji and Ors.