Application allowed as withdrawn by the applicant; Court clarified that the application was not heard on merits.
Application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-apl-838-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.838 OF 2018
Harikishan Nandkishor Purohit ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Ms. Vilasini Balsubramaniam i/b Mr. Tushar Limbajirao Pimple for the Applicant
Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar, A.P.P for the Respondent–State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. (THROUGH VIDEO-CONFERENCING) TUESDAY, 13th JULY 2021
P.C. :
1 At the outset, as soon as the matter is called out, learned
counsel for the applicant, on the instructions of the applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the application.
merits.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
1/1
Harikishan Nandkishor Purohit
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
