Dismissed

Sumit S/O Nana Tarvare v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Hinganghat Dist.Wardha and Another

Bombay HC13 Aug 2021APL/490/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order records the withdrawal of Criminal Application No.490/2021 by the learned Advocate for the applicant, who sought permission to withdraw with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings. The application was dismissed accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings.

Sumit S/O Nana Tarvare Vs State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

26.Cri.APL No.490.21

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.490/2021 Sumit S/o. Nana Tarvare

¶5

Vs.

¶6

State of Maharashtra and Anr.

¶7

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders

¶9

 Court's or Judge's orders

¶10

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri Vivek Awachat, Advocate for Applicant.
Shri S. S. Doifode, A.P.P. for Non-applicants/State.

¶11

CORAM : V. M .DESHPANDE AND

¶12

AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

¶13

DATE:13/08/2021.

¶14

1.Heard Shri Vivek Awachat, learned Advocate for
the applicant.

¶15

2.After hearing the learned Advocate for the
applicant and Shri S. S. Doifode, learned Additional Public
Prosecutor for the State, when this Court showed its
disinclination to grant relief and was about to dismiss the
matter, the learned Advocate for the applicant on
instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application
with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings.

¶16

3.The application is dismissed, as withdrawn with
liberty as prayed for.

¶17

JUDGE JUDGE

¶18

RGurnule

Sumit S/O Nana Tarvare v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Hinganghat Dist.Wardha and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumit S/O Nana Tarvare v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Hinganghat Dist.Wardha and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaya Laxmanrao Kene Vs State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Ps Dattapur, Tahsildhamangaon Railway Distamravati and Another

Duru Soma Katlami Vs State of Mah. Thr. Pso Jarawandi Tah.Etapalli Dist.Gadchiroli

Satish @ Kannya S/O. Tikamchand Badnakhe Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Dharni, Tq. Dharni, Dist. Amrvati and Another

Ramdas S/O Kawaduji Kuranjekar Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps Bhandara Police Station, Dist. Bhandara and Another

Dinesh S/O Ashokrao Athawale Vs State of Mah. Thr. S.P. Central Jail Amravati and Another

Balaji S/O Kashiram Ingale Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps Karanja (City), Tq. Karanja, Dist. Washim and Another