The single-judge court disposed of Criminal Appeal No. 313 of 2020 as withdrawn because the underlying appeal was settled and an earlier Division Bench order dated February 5, 2021 rendered the application infructuous.
Application disposed of as withdrawn because settlement was reached between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
sr.4
Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 313 OF 2020
MRS. PINKY NEERAJ KALRO NEE MS. PINKY RAMESH SIPPY ) APPLICANT V/S.
MR. NEERAJ KALRO AND MR. RANI KALRO ) RESPONDENTS
Mr. Santosh D. Raje, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Ravi Gadagkar i/by. Mr. Prakash Mahadik, Advocate for respondents no.1 and 2.
Mr. Y.M. Nakhawa, APP for State.
Coram : Sandeep K. Shinde, J.
Saturday, 4th December, 2021.
P.C. :
passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Family Court
Appeal (St.) No.99567/2020 read with speaking to
minutes order dated 23rd February, 2021 and in view of the
Digitally signed by NEETA NEETA SHAILESH SHAILESH SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2021.12.04 16:46:56 +0530
settlement between the parties, the application is rendered
infructous. It is disposed of as withdrawn.
(Sandeep K. Shinde, J.)
Mrs. Pinky Neeraj Kalro Nee Ms. Pinky Ramesh Sippy
Mr. Neeraj Kalro
Mr. Rani Kalro
Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
