Criminal bench disposed of a duplicate application for quashing an FIR and framing charges, noting alternative remedies existed and prior application was withdrawn without liberty to file fresh ones.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-APL-294-2020.doc
1 / 2
Digitally signed by BHAGYAWANT BHAGYAWANT TATYARAO TATYARAO PUNDE PUNDE Date: 2021.08.13 09:04:23 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 294 OF 2020
Dharmendra Chhanalal Patel & Anr.
...Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. Tejar Barot a/w. Mr. Ravindra Suryawanshi, Archis Bhatt i/by. Ravi Suryawanshi & Associates for applicants. Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for State.
CORAM : S. S. SHINDE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATE : 12th AUGUST, 2021.
P.C. :
No. 14 of 2017 (Dharmendra Chhanalal Patel & Anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra), taking exception to the FIR, however, the said application was withdrawn on instructions, without seeking liberty to present the fresh application. The said application was allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Bhagyawant Punde
14-APL-294-2020.doc
2 / 2
exception to the FIR, this subsequent application is filed for the same relief. Admittedly, the applicants did not seek liberty to file the present application when the earlier application was withdrawn.
( N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (S. S. SHINDE, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Dharmendra Chhanalal Patel & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
S. S. SHINDE
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
