Disposed

Tushar S/O. Anil Jaiswal v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Ramnagar, and Anr.

Bombay HC21 Sept 2021APL/159/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Nagpur disposed of Criminal Application No. 159/2019 filed by Tushar s/o Anil Jaiswal as withdrawn. The applicant expressed a desire to file a discharge application before the Trial Court. The court granted a liberty as prayed without hearing the case on merits.

What did the court decide?

The criminal application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

Tushar S/O. Anil Jaiswal Vs the State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

apl159.19 16

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.159/2019 Tushar s/o Anil Jaiswal

¶5

..vs..

¶6

The State of Mah., thr.PSO PS Ramnagar, District Chandrapur and anr

¶7

................................................................................................................................................................... OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders

¶8

................................................................................................................................................................... Shri C.S.Dharmadhikari, Counsel for the Applicant. Shri V.A.Thakare, Addl.P.P. for the State.

¶9

CORAM : V.M.DESHPANDE & AMIT B.BORKAR, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 21, 2021.

¶10

1.Learned counsel Shri C.S.Dharmadhikari for the
applicant, submits that during pendency of this present
application Investigating Officer filed chargesheet. He
submits that he has instructions from the applicant to
withdraw the present application since the applicant wishes
to file discharge application before Trial Court.

¶11

The statement is accepted.

¶12

2. The criminal application stands disposed of as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶13

3. It is made clear that the case of the applicant
was not heard by the Court on its own merits.

¶14

JUDGEJUDGE

¶15

!! BRW !!

¶16

...../-

Tushar S/O. Anil Jaiswal v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Ramnagar, and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tushar S/O. Anil Jaiswal v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Ramnagar, and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kashinath Motiram Lonkar and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. the P.S.O., Selu P.S., and Anr.

Pyar Singh Jagjeet Singh Juni Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Nagbhid

Ankush Dharma Chavan (in Jail) Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer, P.S. Khandala Tq. Pusad Dist. Yavatmal

Suresh Mansaram Dakhane Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Purada Tq. Kurkheda Dist. Gadchiroli

Rajendra S/O Panjabrao Lahe and 2 Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Police Station Karanja (Rural), Tq. Karanja, Dist. Washim and 1 Anr.

Dsd Progressive Associates Thr. Its Partner, Dhananjay S/O. Laxmanrao Deshpande and Anr. Vs Shirish S/O. Premchand Jain (Ori. Applicant)