Allowed

Noor Khan Munir Khan Pathan v. State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Barshitakli Tqbrashitakli Distakola and Another

Bombay HC14 Jan 2021APEAL/99/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an appeal under Section 14 of the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against an order rejecting regular bail. The Court confirmed a temporary bail order dated 21.02.2020 on the same conditions.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Appeal is allowed and the bail order dated 21.02.2020 is confirmed on the same conditions.

Noor Khan Munir Khan Pathan Vs State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O… — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

1401apeal99.20

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .

¶4

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 99 OF 2020

¶5

(Noor Khan Munir Khan Pathan vs. State of Maharashtra thr. PSO, Barshitakli, Tq.
Barshitakli, District - Akola & Anr.)

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________
appearances, Court's orders of directionsCourt's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.

¶7

Shri Imran Deshmukh with Y.K. Dhande, Advocate for
the appellant.

¶8

Shri M.J. Khan, APP for respondent No. 1 – State.

¶9

CORAM : PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J.

¶10

JANUARY 14, 2021.

¶11

Heard Shri Deshmukh, learned counsel
for the appellant and Shri Khan, learned APP for
respondent No.1 – State. Respondent No. 2 though
served, is not present.

¶12

2.This is an appeal under Section 14-A of
the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
1989, filed against an order of rejection of Regular
Bail to the appellant, passed on 31.01.2020 in Misc.
Criminal Application No. 44 of 2020.

¶13

3.This Court has already released the
appellant on temporary bail on 21.02.2020. Today, I
have perused the reply filed on behalf of the State.

¶14

¶15

1401apeal99.20

¶16

The reply does not reveal any other material than has
been considered by this Court while releasing the
appellant on temporary bail. This Court has already
considered the nature of allegations against the
appellant.

¶17

4.Considering the nature of offence and
the allegations, this Court is inclined to confirm the
order dated 21.02.2020 on the same conditions.
Criminal Appeal is allowed accordingly.

¶18

JUDGE

¶19

*GS.

Noor Khan Munir Khan Pathan v. State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Barshitakli Tqbrashitakli Distakola and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Noor Khan Munir Khan Pathan v. State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Barshitakli Tqbrashitakli Distakola and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh @ Raju Vitthalrao Wahare Vs State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Deoli

Rajesh @ Raju Vitthalrao Wahare Vs State of Mah

Shamrao Motiram Atram (in Jail) Vs State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Ps Laheri Distgadchiroli

Jageshwar Wasudeo Kawle Vs State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Ps Girad, Tah. Samudrapur, Distwardha

State of Mah., Thr. Atni Corruption Bureau, Amravati Vs Raju Shyamrao Makeshwar

Smt. Jasumati Wd/O Jethalal Thaker Vs Satpal Singh Kasturialal Arora and 2 Others