Disposed

Rajiyabi Sheikh Chand v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps Digras, Tah. Digras, Dist. Yavatmal and 2 Others

Bombay HC25 Jan 2021APEAL/525/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge confirmed interim protection granted to the appellant in pending criminal proceedings by making the interim order absolute and imposing three specific conditions for release.

What did the court decide?

Confirmed interim protection granted to appellant by making the order dated 23/12/2020 absolute subject to three conditions.

Rajiyabi Sheikh Chand Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

 15cri.apeal525.2020.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 525 OF 2020
(Rajiyabi Sheikh Chand Vrs.State of Maharashtra, thr. P.S.O., P.S. Digras,
Tah. Digras, Dist. Yavatmal and others.)

¶5

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order

¶6

Shri S.H. Sudame, Adv. for the appellant.
Shri M.J. Khan, A.P.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2/State.

¶7

CORAM:PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J.

¶8

DATED :- JANUARY 25, 2021

¶9

Heard.

¶10

Perused the affidavit-in-reply filed by learned
Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State.

¶11

This Court while granting interim protection
already considered the merits of the allegations. A perusal
of reply filed on behalf of the State does not show any
other ground for not confirming the interim protection
granted to the appellant.

¶12

In such circumstances, considering the nature
of the offence and the allegations, the interim protection
granted to the appellant by this Court vide order dated
23/12/2020 is made absolute on the following additional
conditions :

¶13

(i)The applicant to attend the

¶14

¶15

 15cri.apeal525.2020.odt

¶16

concerned police station once in a month
i.e. on every first Thursday of the month
between 12.00 noon and 2.00 p.m.

¶17

(ii)The applicant shall not give threats
to the witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

¶18

(iii)The applicant shall not leave his
local jurisdiction without prior intimation
to the concerned police station.

¶19

JUDGE

¶20

D.S. Baldwa

Rajiyabi Sheikh Chand v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps Digras, Tah. Digras, Dist. Yavatmal and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajiyabi Sheikh Chand v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps Digras, Tah. Digras, Dist. Yavatmal and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Malik S/O Abdul Razzaque Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Police Station Officer, Police Station, A.T.S. Mumbai, Mumbai

Rajesh S/O. Dharamchand Jain (Nahar) Vs Sau. Jayashree Arvind Kadam

M/S. Shree Gajanan Construction Company Thr Its Partner Shri. Vilas Sontakke Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps Shirpur, Tah. Wani, Dist. Yavatmal and 3 Others

Kushal Kawaduji Singanjude Vs Ramnarayan Durgaprasad Agrawal (Kejadiwal)

The State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Wadgaon Road, Yavatmal Vs Arun S/O Vasantrao Meshram

Ajay Bhaskar Kulkarni Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Pso Ps Gadge Nagar Eow Amravati