The High Court of Bombay disposed of a criminal appeal noting that the appellant deposited the balance amount of Rs.1,27,50,000/- with the competent authority.
The appeal was disposed of after noting the deposit of the balance amount by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by Mandira Salgaonkar Date: 2021.03.10 17:58:53 +0530
1/1 45 APEAL-496-20.doc
Mandira Salgaonkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.496 OF 2020
M/S Picsell Realtors LLP through it’s
authorised representative Mr.Vineet
Govardhan Shah
..Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr... Respondents
Mr.Pravin Gaikwad for the Appellant.
Ms.Rebecca Gonsalvez, Special P.P. with Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP for
Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ.
DATED : 09th MARCH, 2021
P.C:-
1.Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant and
learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
2.Admittedly, the balance amount of Rs.1,27,50,000/- has been
deposited by the appellant. The respondent-competent authority is
free to act upon clauses (5) and (6) of the order dated 14th October,
2020, passed by the Special Judge, MPID, City Civil & Sessions Court
for Greater Bombay in Miscellaneous Application No.859 of 2020 in
MPID Case No.1 of 2014.
3. With the above observations, the appeal stands disposed of.
(MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.)
M.M.Salgaonkar
M/S Picsell Realtors LLP
The State of Maharashtra
S.S.Shinde
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court