Dismissed

Uttam Parbat Varpe and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC2 Aug 2021APEAL/367/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad, led by Patil J, granted leave to withdraw a criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A of the Atrocities Act as no order from the Special Court was solicited or available for challenge. A related application for assistance was also disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the appeal with liberty to apply for anticipatory bail before the Special Court.

Uttam Parbat Varpe and Anr. Vs the State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.367 OF 2021 (Uttam Parbat Varpe and another Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another)

¶3

Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for the appellants
Smt. R.P. Gaur, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
Mr. K.N. Shermale, Advocate for the applicant in
Criminal Application No.1549/2021, for assisting to A.P.P.

¶4

CORAM :MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

¶5

DATE :02.08.2021

¶6

PER COURT:

¶7

After it was pointed out that since after inclusion of the
offences under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention
of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (“Atrocities Act”, for short), no order from the
Special Court has been solicited which can be challenged in appeal under
Section 14-A of the Atrocities Act, the learned Advocate for the appellants,
on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to apply
for anticipatory bail before the Special Court.

¶8

2.Leave is granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty as prayed for.

¶9

¶10

CRIAPL367-2021+

¶11

3. In view of dismissal of Criminal Appeal No.367/2021, Criminal

¶12

Application No.1549/2021, filed by the original informant seeking
permission to assist the A.P.P., is disposed of.

¶13

[MANGESH S. PATIL]
JUDGE

¶14

npj/CRIAPL367-2021+

Uttam Parbat Varpe and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uttam Parbat Varpe and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jyoti Kalyan Thakur and Anr. Vs Kalyan Narayansingh Thakur

Shaikh Shahin Shaikh Sardar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Sandesh Shivajirao Potdar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Navnath @ Radhakisan S/O. Waman Jagtap Vs Uttam Parbat Varpe and Others

Madhukar S/O. Dattarao Jadhav and Others Vs Manisha W/O. Madhukar Jadhav and Anr.

Madhukar S/O. Dattarao Jadhav Vs Manisha W/O. Madhukar Jadhav and Anr.