High Court dismissed criminal appeal as infructuous because the trial court dropped charges under the Atrocities Act, which were non-bailable, while remaining charges were bailable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
criapl282.20
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
919 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.282 OF 2020
ANITA W/O. GORAKH MINDHE AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Mr. K. N. Shermale, Advocate for the appellants Mr. S. N. Morampalle, APP for the respondent/State Mr. A. R. Gaikwad, Advocate for the respondent No.2 (appointed)
CORAM : SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J. DATE : 03-09-2021
P. C.
. The appellants have filed this appeal to challenge the order dated 12-03-2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner in Criminal Bail Application No. 35 of 2020. The appellants were prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
1 of 2
(2) criapl282.20
Order
The ‘ Non-cognizable summary’ sought for is granted’
[ SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J. ]
VishalK/criapl282.20
2 of 2
Anita W/O. Gorakh Mindhe
The State of Maharashtra
Surendra P. Tavade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
