Dismissed

Ketan Madhukar Misal and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC22 Jul 2021ABA/905/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of anticipatory bail applications filed by Ketan Misal and Nutan Nalawade in a matrimonial flood case under Section 498-A IPC. Upon representation that custodial interrogation was not required for the investigation, the court treated the applications as infructuous and dismissed them.

What did the court decide?

The anticipatory bail applications and concomitant interim applications were disposed off as infructuous.

Ketan Madhukar Misal and Ors. Vs the State of… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1/3

¶2

Rane

¶3

ABA-905&906-2019(sr.3)
22.7.2021

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 905 OF 2019

¶6

Ketan Madhukar Misal & Ors.....Applicants
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra...Respondent

¶7

ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 932 OF 2019

¶8

IN

¶9

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 905 OF 2019

¶10

Reshma Ketan Misal

¶11

....Applicant/
Intervenor

¶12

IN THE MATTER BETW EEN :

¶13

Mr. Ketan Madhukar Misal and Ors.
V/s.

¶14

....Orig.Applicant

¶15

The State of Maharashtra....Respondent

¶16

AND ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 906 OF 2019

¶17

Nutan Ashish Nalawade.....Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra....Respondent

¶18

WITH

¶19

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 931 OF 2019
IN

¶20

2/3

¶21

Rane

¶22

ABA-905&906-2019(sr.3)
22.7.2021

¶23

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 906 OF 2019

¶24

Reshma Ketan Misal....Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETW EEN :
Nutan Ashish Nalawade.....Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra....Respondent

¶25

* * * *

¶26

Mr. Shriram S. Chaudhari, Advocate for applicant in both
Ant.Bail Applications.

¶27

None for the applicants in Intervention Applications.

¶28

Mrs. Sharmila Kaushik, APP for State-Respondent.

¶29

CORAM : NITIN W . SAMBRE, J.

¶30

 22nd July, 2021.

¶31

P.C. :

¶32

1. Out of matrimonial discord, the complainant wife
alleged offence punishable under Section 498-A read with
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code resulting into registration
of Crime No.27/2019.

¶33

2. All the applicants are seeking pre-arrest bail in the
aforesaid crime on the ground of false implication.

¶34

3/3

¶35

Rane

¶36

ABA-905&906-2019(sr.3)
22.7.2021

¶37

3.Learned APP, Mrs. Kaushik, on instructions,
informs that as the investigation in the matter is already
complete, chargesheet is filed against the accused persons. On
instructions, a specific statement is made, that the applicant’s
custodial interrogation is not required.

¶38

4. The aforesaid statement since is made on
instructions, the same is accepted.

¶39

5. The applications as such, stand disposed off as
infructous.

¶40

6. As a consequence of disposal of present applications,
the interim applications also stand disposed off.

¶41

Digitally signed by NEETA NEETA SHAILESH SHAILESH SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2021.07.22 14:06:48 +0530

¶42

(NITIN W . SAMBRE, J.)

Ketan Madhukar Misal and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ketan Madhukar Misal and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Ashok Thepade Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dhananjay Panaru Yadav and Anr. Vs the Senior Inspector of Police and Anr.

Haridas Netrapal Vs the Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Mumbai

Amrita Rakesh Panchal Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nutan Ashish Nalawade Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rahul Prakash Kale Vs the State of Maharashtra