Rajendra S/O. Dashrath Bhoge v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What did the court decide?
Leave to withdraw the application is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 792 OF 2020 (Rajendra Dashrath Bhoge Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another)
Mr. A.S. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. S.W. Mundhe, A.P.P. for the respondents/State
CORAM :MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE :20.01.2021
PER COURT:
The learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw the application. Leave is granted. The application is
dismissed as withdrawn.
[MANGESH S. PATIL]
JUDGE
npj/ABA792-2020
Rajendra Dashrath Bhoge
The State of Maharashtra
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court