Mohd. Inam Sukhrullah Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The court rejected an application for anticipatory bail in a criminal case concerning property grabbing via forged documents. The judge held that investigation revealed the applicant's complicity in executing a false sale deed and transferring the electricity meter, negating any case for bail.
What did the court decide?
Application for anticipatory bail rejected; custody of the applicant is necessitated.
What the court decided
1 of 2 20.ABA.659.2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.659 OF 2021
Mohd. Inam Sukhrullah Shaikh
versus
The State of Maharashtra
Applicant
Respondent
Mr.aniket Vagal for applicant.
Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for State.
CORAM :PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE : 11th March 2021
PC :
1.This is an application for anticipatory bail in CR No.663 of
2020 registered with Shivaji Nagar Police Station, Govandi for
offences under Sections 467, 471, 420 r/w 34 of IPC. The FIR was
registered on 6th December 2020.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is maintainable given the complicity of the applicant in fabricating sale deed and transferring electricity meter to grab property.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohd. Inam Sukhrullah Shaikh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Prakash D. Naik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court