IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
Application allowed to be withdrawn at this stage with liberty to approach Court again for anticipatory bail once proclamation orders are set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-ABA-646-20.odt
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.646 OF 2020
Shirishkumar Rangrao Chavan.... Applicant
versus
State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
Mr.Anand S. Patil, Advocate for Applicant.Ms.A.A. Takalkar, APP for the State/Respondent.CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 18th MARCH, 2021
P.C. :
1. At the outset learned counsel for the Applicant concedes that there are proclamations pending against him issued by Consumer Court, Belapur. He submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw this application, at this stage, with liberty to the Applicant to approach this Court for anticipatory bail, once the proclamation orders are set aside.
2. Permission is granted. The application is allowed to be withdrawn at this stage, with liberty to the Applicant to approach this Court again for anticipatory bail, once all the proclamation orders issued against him are set aside.
3. The application is not heard on merits.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Nesarikar
Shirishkumar Rangrao Chavan
State of Maharashtra
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court