Gujarat High Court dismissed a criminal revision regarding constitutionality of order dated 28/02/2022. Constitution Bench held that order was lawful or denounced.
Anticipatory bail application allowed and interim protection confirmed subject to attendance at the police station.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 4 ABA-447-20.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.447 OF 2020
Krishna Shahu Koli .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent …
Mr.Sagar Tambe with Mr.Kamran Shaikh i/b Mr.Ritesh Thobde for the Applicant.
Mr.S.H.Yadav, APP for the State.
Mr.Suraj D. Mulani attached to Vijapur Naka Police Station, Solapur City present.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 04th DECEMBER, 2021
P.C:-
The offence in which the applicant is arraigned as an accused invokes Sections 120-B, 115, 212 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3, 4/25 of the Arms Act and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act.
M.M.Salgaonkar
2/2 4 ABA-447-20.doc
which is observed by this Court in the order order 28/02/2020, I am inclined to confrm the said interim protection, subject to the stipulation that the applicant shall attend the police station as and when called for.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
M.M.Salgaonkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the seasonal interim protection granted earlier should be confirmed subject to attendance at the police station.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Krishna Shahu Koli
The State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
