Allowed

Lindwall Joseph Rodrigues v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC7 Aug 2021ABA/2312/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the anticipatory bail application of the applicant facing charges for cheating and criminal breach of trust. The interim order was confirmed following the deposit of Rs. 20 Lakhs. Conditional bail was granted subject to a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; interim order confirmed; release on bail with P.R. Bond of Rs. 25,000 and sureties.

Lindwall Joseph Rodrigues Vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

7-Aba-2312-2019.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2312 OF 2019

¶4

Lindwall Joseph Rodrigues

¶5

… Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶8

Mr. Akash Singh i/by Mr. Ashok M. Saraogi, Advocate for the
Applicant.

¶9

Mr. R. M. Pethe, APP for the Respondent – State.

¶10

Mr. K. A. Bagul, (P.S.I.), Dadar Police Station, Mumbai, Present.

¶11

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE: 7th AUGUST, 2021.

¶12

PER COURT:

¶13

1.The applicant is apprehending arrest in C.R. No.251 of

¶14

2019 registered with Vinoba Bhave Nagar Police Station, Mumbai

¶15

for offence under Section 406 & 420 of Indian Penal Code (for
short “IPC”).

¶16

2.The applicant was granted interim protection vide
order dated 18th October, 2019. The interim order records that the
learned counsel for the applicant without going into the merits of
the case and without prejudice to his rights and contentions had

¶17

Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR JAMADAR Date:2021.08.07 17:39:10 +0530

¶18

1 of 3

¶19

SLJ

¶20

7-Aba-2312-2019.doc

¶21

shown willingness to deposit Rs.20 Lakhs in the registry of this
Court. Affidavit-cum-undertaking in that regard was submitted in
the Court. The said undertaking has been taken on record.

¶22

3.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in
compliance with the said undertaking and the interim order passed
by this Court, the applicant has deposited of Rs.20 Lakhs in the
registry of this Court.

¶23

4.He has produced the receipt with regards to the said
deposits. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, interim order
dated 18th October, 2019 passed by this Court can be confirmed.

¶24

5.Hence, I pass the following order:

¶25

ORDER

¶26

(i) Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2312 of 2019 is
allowed;

¶27

(ii)Interim order dated 18th October, 2019 is confirmed.

¶28

(iii) In the event of arrest of the applicant in connection
with in C.R. No.251 of 2019 registered with Vinoba Bhave
Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, the applicant be released on
bail on furnishing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with
one or two sureties in the like amount;

¶29

(iv)The applicant shall appear before the investigating
officer as and when called for till filing of charge-sheet.

¶30

2 of 3

¶31

SLJ

¶32

7-Aba-2312-2019.doc

¶33

(v)Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of
accordingly.

¶34

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

¶35

3 of 3

¶36

SLJ

Lindwall Joseph Rodrigues v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lindwall Joseph Rodrigues v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod R Chavan and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Samadhan Pralhad Tekale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nagesh Sadashiv Bhandari Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rajan Pujari Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mohammed Mohasim Abdul Shukur Ansari Vs Sr. Police Inspector and Anr.

Pravej Imam Ali Sheikh Vs the State of Maharashtra