Application for anticipatory bail was allowed to be withdrawn as the matter was mutually settled between the parties. The application was disposed of accordingly.
Application allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9.aba.209-20.doc
PMB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.209 OF 2020
Shrirang Pandurang Kank
.. Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
.. Respondents
Mr. Neeraj Yadav i/b. R. Sathyanarayanan for the applicant. Mr. N.B. Patil, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 4, 2021
P.C.:-
(M.S. KARNIK, J.)
Digitally signed by PRADNYA PRADNYA MAKARAND MAKARAND BHOGALE BHOGALE Date: 2021.12.04 15:28:47 +0530
1/1
Shrirang Pandurang Kank
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
