The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed unconditional withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application and disposed of it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44.ABA-208-21.odt
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.208 OF 2021
Parmeshwar @ Bhau Nana Gaikwad ….Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
Mr. Vishal Vasudev Bhoir, Advocate a/w. Kishor Ajetrao, for the
Applicant.
Mrs. A.A. Takalkar, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM :SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 09th FEBRUARY, 2021
P.C. :
1.After arguing for some time, when I expressed my
disinclination to grant relief in this Application, learned Counsel
for the Applicant prays for unconditional withdrawal of this
Application.
2.Permission is granted. The Application is allowed to be
withdrawn unconditionally and is disposed of accordingly.
Pradeepkumar P. Deshmane
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Digitally signed by Pradeepkumar P. Deshmane Date: 2021.02.10 16:37:08 +0530
Deshmane (PS)
1 of 1
Parmeshwar @ Bhau Nana Gaikwad
State of Maharashtra
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court