In this anticipatory bail application regarding non-cognizable offences, the applicant withdrew the petition after the investigating officer indicated the case was non-cognizable. The court disposed of the application as not pressed without examining its merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ingale
Digitally signed URMILAPRAMOD by URMILAPRAMODINGALEDate: INGALE 2021.12.0819:17:03 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 206 OF 2020
Ajinkya Anant Ghorpade .. Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra and anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Chintan Yogesh Shah, for Applicant. Mr. N.B.Patil, for the Respondent – State. Mr.Kajari, API, Kharghar Police Station, Navi Mumbai.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2021
P.C.:-
1/2
). In this view of the matter, nothing survives for consideration in the present application and the application is not pressed. It is clarifed that in the event, ‘NC Summary’ is not accepted by the learned Magistrate and further steps are to be taken against the applicant, 7t) hours notice be given by the Investigating Ofcer to the applicant before taking any coercive action against him.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.)
2/2
Ajinkya Anant Ghorpade
The State of Maharashtra
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
