Rajwinder Singh Ajit Singh v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Court confirmed anticipatory bail for the applicant in a property dispute involving allegations of forgery regarding a gift deed. The court noted the applicant was not a party to the allegedly forged document and ordered cooperation with the investigation.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail granted; applicant directed to cooperate with investigation and not tamper with evidence.
What the court decided
6-aba-1537-19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1537 OF 2019
Rajwinder Singh Ajit Singh ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents
Mr. Amit Singh, for the Applicant.
Mr. Chirag Chanani i/b. Dewani Associates, for the Respondent No.2.
Ms. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent / State. PSI Vijay Pavad, Hill Line Police Station Ulhasnagar Present.
MAMTA Digitally signedby MAMTA AMAR AMAR KALEDate: KALE 2021.08.1315:34:48 +0530
CORAM : C. V. BHADANG, J. DATE : 13 AUGUST 2021
P.C.
. The Applicant apprehending arrest in connection with investigation of Crime No.154/2019 of Police Station Hill-Line Thane under Section 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 r/w. Section 34 of IPC, is seeking anticipatory bail. There are in all four Accused in the said crime. The Applicant happens to be the Accused No.4.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail sought by the applicant in connection with allegations of forgery in a property dispute should be confirmed.
Whether the nature of allegations centered upon a deed to which the applicant was not a party justifies granting interim protection.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rajwinder Singh Ajit Singh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
C. V. BHADANG
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court