The plaintiff sought leave to withdraw suit No.2513 of 2007 settled out of court. The High Court allowed withdrawal with no order on costs and refund of court fees. The related notice of motion was disposed of by operation of law.
Leave granted to withdraw the suit; suit disposed as withdrawn; notice of motion disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by Smita Smita Gonsalves Date: 2021.03.19 Gonsalves 12:51:52 +0530
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.2513 OF 2007
ALONG WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.54 OF 2018 IN
SUIT NO.2513 OF 2007
M/s. JIK Industries Limited...Plaintiff
vs.
M/s. Paul Merchants Limited And Anr....Defendants
Mr. Sudhakar G. Lakhani, for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Rumi Mirza, a/w. Mr. Kaushal Thakker, i/b. Mr. Prashant Kulkarni, for
Defendant No.1.
Ms. Anusha Jacob, i/b. AZB & Partners, for Defendant No.2.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATED : 17 MARCH 2021
P.C. :
.Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff seeks leave to withdraw the
suit, as settled out of Court. Suit disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to
costs. Refund of Court fees in accordance with the applicable Rules.
2.In view of the disposal of the suit, the notice of motion does not
survive and is disposed of.
Pg 1 of 1
S.C. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court