Executed application where the respondent appeared and submitted to orders under Order 21 Rule 22 CPC, permitting the applicant-award holder to proceed in execution; notice disposed accordingly.
Applicant permitted to proceed in execution; notice disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE NO. 178 OF 2019
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 679 OF 2019
Aastha Telecom
… Applicant
vs.
Mahanagar Telphone Nigam Ltd. … Respondent
Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/b. PDS Legal for the Applicant.
Mr. Niranjan Shimpi for the Respondent.
CORAM : A. K. MENON, J. DATED : 26th OCTOBER, 2021
P.C. :
served upon the respondent who today appears and submits to orders of the Court. In view thereof the applicant – award holder is permitted to proceed in execution.
RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI
Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2021.10.27 16:47:54 +0530
1/1
22-n-178-2019-exa-679-2019.odt rrpillai
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aastha Telecom
Mahanagar Telphone Nigam Ltd.
A. K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
