the one hand and Respondent Nos.4 to 9 on the other, that the impugned order of AGRC may be quashed and set aside and the applications may be remanded to it for a fresh hearing in accordance with law. Accordingly, the impugned order of the AGRC dated 9 January 2020 is quashed and set aside and the applications, namely, Application (L) No.122 of 2018 and Application (L) No.46 of 2018 are remitted to the AGRC for a fresh hearing in accordance with law. It is made clear that the AGRC must hear, in particular, the grievance of the Petitioner herein, who is the developer of the subject Slum Rehabilitation project, that it was prevented from implementing the project any further due to the obstructive attitudes adopted by some slum dwellers and for which, the developer had to make frequent approaches to courts of law and despite such approaches the orders requiring vacating of existing accommodations by the slum dwellers, could not be implemented. This is without prejudice to other contentions of both sides. All rights and contentions of the parties on merits are kept open, to be debated before AGRC when the applications are heard on remand. The applications shall be decided by the AGRC on their own merits.
