Petitioners sought leave to withdraw a writ petition (WP No. 725 of 2020) after settling the dispute. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
37-WP-725-20.doc
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.725 OF 2020
Y. Rajeev Reddy and Anr.
...Petitioners
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Shivraj N. Kundge i/b Shibu Devasia for the Petitioners.
Mr. S. R. Shinde, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE &
N. R. BORKAR, J.
DATE : 5/3/2020.
P.C.:
.Learned counsel for the Petitioners upon instructions seeks
leave to withdraw the petition as parties have settled the dispute.
2. Learned APP appears for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
3. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(N. R. BORKAR, J.)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Y. Rajeev Reddy
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Dharmadikari
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court