Petitioners sought leave to withdraw their writ petition after being informed of a similar earlier dismissed writ. The court permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
902-wp-6399-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6399 OF 2019
Pradeep Laxman Chavan and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The Secretary, Department of Irrigation and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. A.D. Sale for the Petitioners. Mr. C.D. Mali, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : A.A. SAYED &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : 13 FEBRUARY 2020
P.C.:
During the course of hearing, when it is pointed out to the learned Counsel for the Petitioners that a Writ Petition was filed earlier raising similar issue viz. Writ Petition No.2367 of 2011 which was dismissed on 30 November 2011 and which has not been referred to in the present Petition, the learned Counsel on instructions from the Petitioner No.1, who is present in Court, seeks leave to withdraw the Petition.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.)
1/1
Uday.P.Kambli
Pradeep Laxman Chavan and Ors.
The Secretary, Department of Irrigation and Ors.
A.A. SAYED
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
