Petitioner filed a writ petition regarding an education matter. Respondent counsel submitted that the Education Officer would decide the proposal on merits within four weeks. The court disposed of the writ petition based on this assurance.
The writ petition is disposed of with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fmp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.6084 OF 2020
Nazim Shah Masoom Shah
… PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others
… RESPONDENTS
Mr. A.G. Talhar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. P.S. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent - State Mr. Maheshkumar S. Sonawane, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mrs. Seema T. Pawar, Advocate for R.Nos.3 & 4
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATE : 4 th NOVEMBER, 2020
O R D E R :
[R. G. AVACHAT] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE
fmp/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be disposed of based on the respondent's submission that the Education Officer will decide the proposal on merits within four weeks.
Nazim Shah Masoom Shah
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
R. G. AVACHAT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
