Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted the leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 1-wp-5640-2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5640 OF 2020
Vinayak Bhanudas Patil… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others… Respondents
… Respondents
Mr. V. S. Undre, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. P. S. Patil, Addl. G. P. for respondent No.1
CORAM :S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED : 23rd NOVEMBER, 2020
PER COURT :-
.Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw the writ petition.
2.Leave granted.
3.Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
SMS
1 of 1
Vinayak Bhanudas Patil
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
R. G. AVACHAT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court