Poonam Amit Lole v. Amit Ashok Lole and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-judge writ petition addresses a maintenance claim rejected by a trial court based on an appointment letter. The High Court set aside the rejection order, directing the trial court to re-hear the application after the petitioner was allowed to place resignation and relieving documents on record.
What did the court decide?
The order dated 21/02/2019 is set aside. The maintenance application is directed to be re-heard by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Baramati within three months.
What the court decided
1/4 03 WP-5567.19 (905).odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5567 OF 2019
Smt. Poonam Lole
. .. Petitioner
Vs.
Amit Lole & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Sushant Prabhune for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rupesh Zade for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM: SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
DATED : 06TH MARCH, 2020.
P.C:-
- Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
- The grievance raised in the Petition is about the Order dated 21/02/2019 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Baramati. The said order has been passed on an Application, below Ex-5, filed by the Plaintiff for grant of interim maintenance of Rs.30,000/- per month from Defendant No.1.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order rejecting the grant of maintenance should be set aside due to lack of opportunity for the petitioner to place resignation and relieving letters on record.
Whether the trial court should afford parties an opportunity to produce additional documents regarding the petitioner's employment status before re-determining the maintenance claim.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Poonam Lole
- respondent
Amit Lole
Coram
Bharati Dangre
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court