Permission was granted to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The matter was disposed of as withdrawn without the court dealing with the merits. All rights and contentions were kept open.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Vina khadpe sr.925.wp.546.2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.546 OF 2020
Anusaya Damu Shriram …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors …Respondents
Mr. S. S. Chaudhari for the petitioner. Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the respondent nos.1 to 5 -State.
CORAM : N. R. BORKAR, J.
DATE : 13th FEBRUARY 2020.
P.C. :
. Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
Digitally signed by Vina Vina A. A. Khadpe Date: 2020.02.15 Khadpe 17:23:41 +0530
[N. R. BORKAR, J.]
1/1
Anusaya Damu Shriram
The State of Maharashtra
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
