Disposed

Chirag S/O Gajanan Mahadule v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Welfare Department and Ors.

Bombay HC20 Jan 2020WP/5440/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The bench disposed of a writ petition seeking protection of the petitioner’s admission and right to appear in examinations as a Nomadic Tribe (Kirad) candidate while the Scrutiny Committee’s decision on caste recognition was pending.

What did the court decide?

Admission of the petitioner stands protected; he is permitted to appear in the examination.

Chirag S/O Gajanan Mahadule Vs the State of… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

1 89.WP5440.19.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.5440/2019

¶4

Chirag Gajanan Mahadule Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.

¶5

…........................................................................................................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

........................................................................................................................................…...
Shri P. A. Jibhkate, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri D. P. Thakare, Additional Government Pleader for respondent Nos.
1 and 2.

¶7

CORAM: R.K. DESHPANDE &

¶8

AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATED: 20th JANUARY, 2020.

¶9

On 02.08.2019 this Court passed an order as

¶10

under.

¶11

“The claim of the petitioner for
'Kirat/Kirad' caste, which is recognized as
Nomadic Tribe (B) category, is pending for
the decision by the Scrutiny Committee,
however, the college is taking adverse
action against the petitioner.

¶12

Issue notice for final disposal of the
matter, to the respondents, returnable on
27.09.2019.

¶13

Mrs. Naik, learned A.G.P. waives
service of notice for respondent nos.1 and
2.

¶14

By way of adinterim order, the
admission of the petitioner shall stand
protected. The petitioner shall be
permitted to appear in the examination
and the result shall be subject to the
decision of the petition.”

¶15

2.In response to the aforesaid order, the reply is
filed by the Scrutiny Committee and the petitioner has also

¶16

2 89.WP5440.19.odt

¶17

placed on record Certificate of Validity dated 18.11.2019. It
is an undisputed position that this petitioner possesses
Certificate of Validity of ‘Kirad’ Nomadic Tribe (B) category.

¶18

3. In view of this, the petitioner is entitled for all the benefits and consequently, continuation of education as a student legally admitted in the course in question.

¶19

4. Petition stands disposed of.

¶20

JUDGEJUDGE

¶21

RGurnule

Chirag S/O Gajanan Mahadule v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Welfare Department and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chirag S/O Gajanan Mahadule v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Welfare Department and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Namrata Sandip Dongre Vs the Union of India, Thr. Secretary of Ministry of Petroleum, Govt. of India, New Delhi and Another

Kalbhairav Matsaya Vyavasaya Cooperative Society through, Secretary Bhaskar Shrawan Satote Vs State of Maha. Thr. Agri., Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development and Fisheries Dept. Thr. Sec. and or

Animesh S/O Dilipsing Nahata Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, School Education and Sports Department, Mumbai and Others