The High Court dismissed a writ petition based on the absence of an adequate alternative remedy before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
Writ petition dismissed with liberty to avail alternative remedy; interim order continued for 4 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 79 wp-5145-20
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5145 OF 2020
Shivaji s/o Shivram Amberao
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
.......
Mr. Omgashad B. Boinwad, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. P.S.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent-State
.......
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 07-12-2020.
PER COURT :
01.The learned A.G.P. raises a preliminary
objection that the petitioner has remedy before the
Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
02.In the light of the above, the writ petition is
disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the
alternate remedy. No costs.
03.The interim Order passed by this Court shall
continue for a period of 4 weeks from today.
2 79 wp-5145-20
04.Needless to state that on lapse of 4 weeks
interim protection granted by this Court shall come to an
end.
05. The learned Counsel for the petitioner may point out to the Tribunal of the time spent in prosecuting the
present writ petition.
[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA]
JUDGE JUDGE
Dahibhate/-
Shivaji s/o Shivram Amberao
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court