to our mind, carries the case no further. The petitioner gave a statement as far back as on 4-10-2003 in which she says her grandfather’s name is Narayan Balu Atak. He did not take any formal education. The uncles of the petitioner are Mahadev, Shankar and Rohidas. She says that as far as her father is concerned, his name is Prakash. Out of Mahadev, Shankar, Rohidas and Prakash, only Mahadev and Rohidas entered theirs names and were admitted to a Primary School. The rest had no occasion to educate themselves. Now, page 120 of the paper-book is said to be a genealogy and family tree forwarded way back by the petitioner herself. She says that her grandfather was Narayan Balu Atak. He had four sons, Mahadev, Shankar, Prakash and Rohidas and two daughters, Hira and Pushplata. As far as Mahadev is concerned, he had three daughters. Shankar is said to have one daughter and one son but their names were not known to the petitioner. It is difficult to believe that while affirming the additional affidavit, the petitioner became aware of the names of the cousin brothers from the paternal side. Therefore, apart from her own family, she was unable to give details of others, stated to be cousins. Then there is an entry in relation to Mahadeo Shankar Atak and Rohidas Nana Atak. They are stated to be admitted to school after the Presidential Notification and in the year 1956 and 1965. These are not, therefore, preconstitutional documents. Thereafter, the petitioner relies upon another communication
