The High Court of Bombay at the Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction disposed of three writ petitions (Nos. 423, 421, and 422 of 2018) as rendered infructuous after the learned counsel submitted that the underlying matter before the trial Court had been compromised.
The applications were disposed of as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(36)WPNo.4232018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.423 OF 2018
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.421 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.422 OF 2018
Subodh Vasudev Mulye…Applicant
Versus
Deepak Gunpal Kunnure & Anr....Respondents
Mr.Anand S. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent No.1/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 10th JANUARY 2020.
P.C.:
1The learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions,
submits that the matter before the trial Court has been
compromised and, as such, the present applications are rendered
infructuous.
2The applications are accordingly disposed of as
rendered infructuous.
1/1
Gaikwad RD
Subodh Vasudev Mulye
Deepak Gunpal Kunnure
A.M Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court