Disposed

Kapil Prakash Deshmukh v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC20 Jan 2020WP/3812/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order records the withdrawal of multiple pending writ petitions by the petitioner (Kapil Prakash Deshmukh), including the principal petition (WP No. 3812 of 2019). The Court allowed the withdrawal without hearing and disposed of the withdrawn petitions with liberty to proceed with newly filed ones.

What did the court decide?

Petitions allowed to be withdrawn; disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to proceed with new petitions.

Kapil Prakash Deshmukh Vs the State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

Sherla V.

¶2

wp.3812.2019++_NOB.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.3812 OF 2019

¶5

Kapil Prakash Deshmukh … Petitioner

¶6

¶7

The State of Maharashtra & others … Respondents

¶8

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3813 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3814 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3815 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3816 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3817 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3818 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3819 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3820 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3821 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3822 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.10237 OF 2019

¶9

Mr.S.S. Pakale with Mr.Saurabh S. Pakale and Mr.Dnyaneshwar Kale i/b S.M. Katkar for the Petitioners in all Writ Petitions

¶10

Mr.B.V. Samant, AGP, for Respondent – State in WP Nos.3812/2019, 3813/2019, 3814/2019 and 3815/2019

¶11

Digitally signed by Vishwanath S. Vishwanath Sherla S. Sherla Date: 2020.01.22 16:07:33 +0530

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

wp.3812.2019++_NOB.doc

¶14

Ms.R.A. Solunkhe, AGP, for Respondent - State in WP Nos.3816/2019, 3817/2019, 3818/2019 and 3819 of 2019

¶15

Mr.M.M. Pable, AGP, for Respondent – State in WP Nos.3820/2019, 3821/2019, 3822/2019 and Writ Petition (Stamp) No.10237 of 2019

¶16

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.

¶17

DATED: JANUARY 20, 2020

¶18

Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Board.

¶19

Mr.Pakale says that after fresh petitions were filed and circulated, there is no need to press these prior petitions which are pending.

¶20

Each of these prior petitions are, therefore, proposed to be withdrawn by Mr.Pakale. Mr.Pakale hands over a list of such cases/petitions, which are pending. They are taken on today’s Board and leave is granted to withdraw each of them. Each of these petitions, therefore, stand disposed off as withdrawn with liberty to proceed with the newly filed petitions.

¶21

(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶22

Page 2 of 2

Kapil Prakash Deshmukh v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kapil Prakash Deshmukh v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Tekchand Gopaldas Khanchandani Vs the State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Shri. Zurve Vaman Laxman Vs the State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary and Ors.

Shri. Manik Sopan Bajare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Rajwant Kaur Vs Union of India and Anr.

Salman Nafis a Qureshi Vs the Principal of Mmk College and 2 Ors.

Mr. Shriniwas Gajanan Marathe Vs Shri. Manish Dalvi, Chairperson