The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Writ Petition No. 36 of 2020 upon the petitioner seeking leave to withdraw the petition, with no costs awarded.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 2-WP36-2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 36 OF 2020
M/s. V. A. Gaikwad Construction Through
its Proprietor Vishal Ashok Gaikwad
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Mr. Tukaram M. Venjane, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 02nd JANUARY, 2020.
PER COURT:-
. The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions seeks leaveto withdraw the writ petition.
2. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
( MANGESH S. PATIL )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
1 of 1
M/s. V. A. Gaikwad Construction Through its Proprietor Vishal Ashok Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Mangesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court