Writ petitions were disposed of as they had become infructuous based on the statement of the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
933-936.doc
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2749 OF 2017, WRIT PETITION NO. 2750 OF 2017, WRIT PETITION NO. 2751 OF 2017, WRIT PETITION NO. 2752 OF 2017
Daud Mohd. Fansopkar
...Petitioner
(In all the petitions)
vs.
The Bhandari Co-op Bank Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents
(In all the petitions)
Mr.Anand S. Patil for the petitioner in all the petitions Mr.Arfan Sait, APP for State in W.P.No.2752/2017 Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP for State in W.P.No.2749/2017 Mr.S.S.Hulke, APP for State in W.P.Nos.2750 and 2751/2017
ShubhaS. Digitallysigned byShubhaS.Pathak Pathak Date:2020.01.1010:39:42+0530
CORAM : SURENDRA P.TAVADE, J.
DATE : JANUARY 9, 2020
P. C. :
. Learned Advocate for the petitioner on instructions submits that the petitions have become infructuous. On the basis of the said statement, Writ Petitions are disposed of as become infructuous.
[SURENDRA P.TAVADE, J.]
s 1/1
Daud Mohd. Fansopkar
The Bhandari Co-op Bank Ltd.
SURENDRA P.TAVADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
