The High Court recalled a dismissal order in a writ petition due to default of appearance. The writ petition was then disposed of as not pressed, leaving grievances open to be raised before a constituted Grievance Redressal Committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nmwl 299-2017.doc
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 299 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2360 OF 2016
Mohammed Saeed Shaikh
...Petitioner/Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
...Respondents
Mr.Omkar Khaiyam Shaikh for Petitioner. Mr.H.B. Takke, AGP for Respondents.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATE : 5 FEBRUARY 2020
P.C. :
This notice of motion seeks recall of a dismissal order passed in the writ petition on 19 April 2017 for default of appearance. For the reasons stated in affidavit in support of the notice of motion, the order of dismissal dated 19 April 2017 is recalled and set aside and the writ petition is restored to file. The notice of motion is disposed of.
2 The writ petition is called out and taken up for hearing by consent. Since Grievance Redressal Committee has been constituted, the Petitioner would like to take his grievances before a committee keeping all the issues raised in the petition open.
3 Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, as not pressed and with liberty to the Petitioner to raise his grievances before the Grievance Redressal Committee. All rights and contentions of the parties on merits in that behalf are kept open.
(S.C. GUPTE, J.)
1 / 1
Mohammed Saeed Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
