The High Court of Bombay discharged the petitioner's application for withdrawal of Writ Petitions No.2289 and 2050 of 2017 respectively, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn. No order as to costs was made.
Leave to withdraw the writ petitions was granted; both Writ Petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
Chittewan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2289 OF 2017
Paper Box Company of India And Kamal Bhatiya … Petitioners Versus Fr. Anthony D’Souza And Others … Respondents
ALONG WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.2050 OF 2018
Sudha Navin Parikh And Others … Petitioners Versus Fr. Anthony D’Souza Vinayalaya And Others … Respondents
…..
Mr. Vivek Shiralkar a/w Ms. Prachi Mhatre and Mr. Vijay Poojari i/b Shiralkar & Co. for the Petitioners in Writ Petition No.2289 of 2017. Mr. Saket Mone i/b Vidhii Partners for the Petitioners in Writ Petition No.2050 of 2018.
Mr. Akash Karmarkar i/b Khaitan & Co. for Respondent No.7.
…..
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATE : 11 FEBRUARY 2020 P.C. :
. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition on instructions of his clients. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
2/2
Chittewan
2 Learned Counsel for the Petitioners in the companion petition (Writ Petition No.2050 of 2018) also seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Digitally signed by Rajesh V. Rajesh V.Chittewan Chittewan Date: 2020.02.17 16:16:11 +0530
Paper Box Company of India
Kamal Bhatiya
Fr. Anthony D'Souza
Sudha Navin Parikh
Fr. Anthony D'Souza Vinayalaya
S.C. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
