The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's repeated non-appearance on listed dates without explanation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
37-wp-1676-17
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1676 OF 2017
Dr. Annasaheb Chaugule Urban ..Petitioner
Vs.
Chandrika Vasant Vankudre..Respondent
Mr. Dheeraj Patil i/b. C. G. Patil , Advocate for Petitioner.
Ms. V. S. Nimbalkar, AGP for Respondent / State.
CORAM : C.V. BHADANG, J.
DATE : 26th FEBRUARY, 2020
P.C.
. None for the petitioner.2.The record shows that on 25/7/2018, 14/8/2018, 7/10/2019
and 12/2/2020, there was no appearance on behalf of the
petitioner. Today again there is no appearance on behalf of the
petitioner.
3.In such circumstances, the petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution, with no order as to costs.
C.V. BHADANG, J.
Mamta Kale
Dr. Annasaheb Chaugule
Chandrika Vasant Vankudre
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court