3 The original complaint is still pending hearing and final disposal before the Industrial Court. The application, Exhibit C-13, on which the order of 19 September 2019 came to be passed, was for disposal on the basis of settlements between the Petitioner establishment and the representative union. This is really a matter of the Petitioner’s defence to the complaint of unfair labour practice. It may well be considered by the Industrial Court at the hearing of the complaint. On the other hand, so far as the application for interim relief made by the complainants (Exhibit U-2) is concerned, it is an admitted position that names of both complainants find place in the list of employees to be made permanent in accordance with the two settlements referred to above. (The only controversy between the parties concerns the date, with effect from which the permanency of the two complainants should be recognized.) The Industrial Court has directed the Petitioner establishment to pay salary and other benefits to these two complainants prospectively on the lines of what is paid to other permanent employee of the Petitioner working on similar posts. The others, who have been made permanent, that is to say, those who were to be made permanent along with the complainants herein, are being paid salaries as permanent employees with effect from 1 May
