Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition and commit herself to prosecute her application with the authorities, leading to the disposal of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 914-WP-1428-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1428 OF 2020
SATYASHILA PRAVIN NAGARGOJE
…PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
…RESPONDENTS
Mr A.A, Phad, Advocate for Petitioner Mr A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents-State
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2020
PER COURT :
costs.
[ SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J. ] [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
mta
Satyashila Pravin Nagargoje
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
