Writ petition regarding non-consideration of police complaints dismissed. Apex Court accepts Appellant statement that police will decide within two days, disposing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nisha Digitally signed by Nisha S. S. Chitnis Date: 2020.09.19 Chitnis 10:56:57 +0530
33. Cri. W. P. 1319-2020.doc
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1319 OF 2020
Geeta Avadheshkumar Singh & ors. .Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & anr. .Respondents
Mr. Devmani Shukla i/b. Mr. Vijay Prakash Yadav, Advocate, for the Petitioners
Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar, APP, for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 - State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 17.09.2020
P. C.
. The grievance of the Petitioners is that the police of the
Mahim Police Station have not taken cognizance of the two written complaints dated 19.09.2019 and 17.01.2020 made by the Petitioners.
statement that the concerned officer of the Mahim Police Station will
take an appropriate decision on the said written complaints dated 19.09.2019 and 17.01.2020 & will communicate the said decision to the
Petitioners, within two weeks from today. Statement accepted.
1 of 2
33. Cri. W. P. 1319-2020.doc
survives for consideration in the aforesaid Petition. The Petition is accordingly disposed of.
All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order
digitally signed by Personal Assistant / Private Secretary / Senior Private Secretary.
2 of 2
Geeta Avadheshkumar Singh & ors.
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
Revati Mohite Dere
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
