Disposed

Ishwarkatti Shivpad Hanmant v. the Deputy Director of Education, Pune Region, Pune and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Jan 2020WP/12126/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition where the deceased petitioner could not be reinstated. The court directed the Management to account for undisclosed salary contributions and matching funds, agreeing to pay the heirs after an order by an Education Officer based on submitted records.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed with directions for the Education Officer to ascertain amounts deducted as contributions and issue an order payable to the heirs.

Ishwarkatti Shivpad Hanmant Vs the Deputy… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

903.WP-12126-13.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.12126 OF 2013

¶4

Ishwarkatti Shivpad Hanmant Since deceased through legal heirs Prabhavati Shivpad Ishwarkatti and Ors. … Petitioners versus The Deputy Director of Education, Pune Region, Pune and Ors. … Respondents

¶5

Mr.I.M.Khairdi for the petitioners.

¶6

Mr.Manish Pable-AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 (State).

¶7

Mr.V.S.Deokar for respondent No.4.

¶8

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I.CHAGLA, JJ.

¶9

DATE :- JANUARY 9, 2020

¶10

P.C. :-

¶11

Having heard both sides we find that the main relief sought by the deceased petitioner cannot be granted. Thus, after his death, there is no question of placing him back or putting him back in the services of the Management.

¶12

However, the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased petitioner are contending on the footing that the deceased petitioner was an employee, though not entitled to pensionary benefits, was always entitled to the sums deducted by

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

M.M.Salgaonkar

¶15

903.WP-12126-13.doc

¶16

the Management from his monthly salary as his contribution and matching contribution, which has been made by the Management. The question of granting pensionary benefit may not arise, but these sums would certainly have to be paid and disbursed and can be collected even by the heirs.

¶17

For this limited aspect, both sides agree to appear before the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad Solapur on 27^th January, 2020 at 10.30 a.m. with all original records and documents in their possession.

¶18

The Education Officer shall give an opportunity to the petitioners/ the heirs and legal representatives of the teacher and the fourth and fifth respondent-Management. After perusing these records, he shall make an appropriate order. Mr.Deokar, on instructions, says that if this amount is lying with the Management, the Management is not averse to paying it to the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased teacher.

¶19

The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. There will be no order as to costs.

¶20

(R.I.CHAGLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶21

Page 2 of 2

¶22

M.M.Salgaonkar

Ishwarkatti Shivpad Hanmant v. the Deputy Director of Education, Pune Region, Pune and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ishwarkatti Shivpad Hanmant v. the Deputy Director of Education, Pune Region, Pune and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Wecom Trust and 2 Anr. Vs Union of India and 5 Ors.

Wecom Trust and 2 Anr. Vs Union of India and 5 Ors.

Wecom Trust and 2 Anr. Vs Union of India and 5 Ors.

Shanta Gorakh Suryavanshi and 19 Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtr through the Government Pleader and 5 Ors.

Ishwarkatti Shivpad Hanmant Vs the Deputy Director of Education, Pune Region, Pune and Ors.

High Court on Its Own Motion Vs Union of India and 6 Ors.